These concerns can lead to tensions between homeowners and the operators of sober living facilities. A key player in overseeing sober living homes in Florida is the Florida Association of Recovery Residences (FARR). Since its founding in 2011, FARR has been responsible for evaluating and monitoring standards-based recovery support services in residential settings across the state. California, home to a significant number of sober living homes, faces unique regulatory challenges to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these recovery environments. The overarching goal is to ensure that sober living homes effectively support individuals in recovery without disrupting the surrounding community. The ADA’s definition of disability includes individuals with addiction to alcohol and those recovering from opioid and substance use disorders, provided they are not currently engaging in illegal drug use.
In some states, the same department that licenses treatment centers also oversees sober living facilities. In other states, the oversight and certification process are outsourced to a third-party, like affiliates of the National Association of Recovery Residences (“NARR”) or other agencies. In these states, the legislature and regulations provide guidance about the requirements for operation, but the third-party is responsible for creating more detailed rules and guidelines for facilities. The staff doesn’t provide any clinical or medical services, but many residents attend outpatient treatment or participate in recovery-based groups while they live there. It’s a “step-down” level of care for those of us who have completed inpatient or outpatient rehab programs.
These laws aim to refine licensing, increase oversight, and establish clear definitions and standards for sober living homes. For instance, Arizona has been deliberating Senate Bill 1655 and Senate Bill 1361, aiming to tighten behavioral health facilities and sober living homes regulations. These bills propose measures such as mandating the filing of incorporation documents within a set timeframe and increasing civil penalties for non-compliance. The issue of oversight in sober living homes is a critical concern that impacts the safety and well-being of residents.
You will want to write down your company name, mission, description and services, determine what type of residence you will purchase or rent, how many residents you will accommodate at any given time, and what services you will provide. You will also want to study and analyze any other sober living homes nearby to determine what works (and what doesn’t work) and determine how you will make your sober living home stand out from the competition. Sober mash certified sober homes living homes are allowed and, in some cases, required to accommodate residents who are prescribed MAT as part of their recovery process.
The owner, manager, and all of the staff must also complete specific training to support the residents. At the end of the day, we want our projected monthly revenue to exceed our average monthly costs, but it’s normal for the first few months or year to be operating at a loss. Getting the answers to these questions will help you determine how you can solve an unmet need in the area and ensure that your sober living meets the needs of your location. We know that choosing a sober living home is not easy and there are many factors to consider before making a decision. Accreditation is one important factor that can help you make a confident and informed decision when the time comes.
In summary, the interplay between federal and state laws and local regulations shapes the landscape in which sober living homes operate. The concerted efforts to tighten oversight and provide resources aim to bolster the effectiveness of these homes in the recovery ecosystem. In West Virginia, there’s a push for more oversight by state lawmakers, with discussions around certification processes and licensing by the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification. However, concerns are raised that excessive focus on regulation might overshadow the operational challenges faced by sober living homes and potentially harm residents seeking recovery.